Compliance360 by TerraSecure

COMPLIANCE FRAMEWORKS

One control program.
Many paths to trust.

Choose the standards that matter, understand what applies, and turn requirements into accountable controls, evidence, tests, findings, and remediation.

COMMON CONTROL MAPPING

INTERNAL CONTROLMulti-factor authenticationOwner · IT Security
One implementation maps to
ISO 27001SOC 2HIPAANIST CSFCMMC
✓ Configuration evidence✓ Access-review record✓ Effectiveness test

MANAGED FRAMEWORK LIBRARY

Start with the program your organization needs.

Framework content is versioned and designed to guide real implementation work—not fabricate compliance status.
HITRUST
Certification readiness

HITRUST CSF

Organize healthcare and information-risk requirements into scoped controls, evidence, testing, and remediation work.

HealthcareRisk-basedCertifiable
01
SOC 2
Attestation readiness

SOC 2

Prepare control operations and evidence around the applicable Trust Services Criteria for an independent CPA examination.

Service organizationsControlsAttestation
02
ISO
Certification readiness

ISO/IEC 27001:2022

Build and maintain an information security management system with scoped risks, controls, ownership, evidence, and continual improvement.

ISMSRisk-basedInternational
03
HIPAA
Regulatory compliance

HIPAA Security Rule

Structure administrative, physical, and technical safeguard work for organizations handling electronic protected health information.

HealthcareePHISafeguards
04
NIST
Security program

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

Assess and improve cybersecurity outcomes across Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover.

CybersecurityOutcomesFlexible
05
CMMC
Assessment readiness

CMMC 2.0

Track practices, evidence, ownership, and remediation for organizations supporting the U.S. defense industrial base.

DefenseCUIAssessment
06
PCI
Compliance readiness

PCI DSS 4.0.1

Coordinate cardholder-data scope, control implementation, evidence, testing, and remediation around payment security requirements.

PaymentsCardholder dataTesting
07
FEDRAMP
Authorization readiness

FedRAMP

Plan federal cloud-security control implementation and evidence work while preserving assessor and agency authorization responsibilities.

Federal cloudNIST 800-53Authorization
08

GUIDED COMPLIANCE

From selection to defensible readiness.

Each program follows a practical sequence so teams know what to do next, why it matters, who owns it, and what proof is expected.

  1. 1

    Select

    Choose the framework and version that fits the organization’s objective.

  2. 2

    Scope

    Document systems, locations, data, teams, vendors, and boundaries in scope.

  3. 3

    Assess

    Establish a current-state baseline without inventing readiness results.

  4. 4

    Implement

    Assign framework-informed controls, owners, tasks, and due dates.

  5. 5

    Prove

    Collect evidence, test operation, resolve findings, and prepare reports.

COMMON CONTROL FRAMEWORK

Do the work once. Reuse it responsibly.

Compliance360 separates a framework requirement from your organization’s control implementation. That lets you map a well-designed control to every relevant requirement while keeping scope, evidence, tests, and exceptions traceable.

01

Map requirements

See which requirements across selected frameworks share the same control objective.

02

Operate one control

Maintain one accountable implementation with an owner, procedure, cadence, and status.

03

Reuse valid evidence

Link approved evidence and tests where they genuinely support the mapped requirements.

04

Keep program context

Preserve framework-specific scope, gaps, findings, and readiness calculations.

QUESTIONS, ANSWERED

Framework readiness without the ambiguity.

Does selecting a framework make us certified or compliant?+

No. Compliance360 supports internal planning, implementation, evidence, and readiness work. Certification, attestation, assessment, or authorization decisions remain with the applicable authorized third party or regulator.

Can we work on more than one framework?+

Yes. A common-control approach lets one internal control support multiple mapped requirements while each framework program retains its own scope, status, and readiness view.

Will our evidence be duplicated for every framework?+

Not when the same approved evidence legitimately supports multiple mapped requirements. Evidence remains tenant-scoped, traceable, reviewable, and reusable where appropriate.

Can we add organization-specific controls?+

Yes. Framework-informed content is a starting point. Your organization can document its own control implementation, ownership, procedures, tests, and exceptions.

CHOOSE YOUR STARTING POINT

Build the program behind the badge.

Select a framework, define your scope, and give every control, evidence request, test, and remediation action a clear owner.